Managing the performance and behaviour of employees comes with a range of challenges for business owners. One of those challenges may be the need to write and issue a formal warning letter to an employee for their poor performance or misconduct.
The idea of having to issue and employee with three separate warnings is a misconception in business. There is no legal minimum number of written warnings required before you can dismiss an employee. You must, however, follow a fair process and give your employee an opportunity to respond to a written warning.
What is a written warning letter?
A written warning letter is a type of formal disciplinary action given to an employee to highlight and address work performance or misconduct.
In your letter, you can define how your employee has breached company policy as stated in their employment contract and, if one was issued, their employee handbook. It’s a written reminder of workplace expectations.
It is usually the next step if a verbal warning was not effective in correcting poor behaviour or work performance.
What is the procedure for an employee written warning?
If you have concerns over an employee's performance or conduct, you must follow a fair performance management or disciplinary process. This includes when giving a written warning.
For misconduct, a disciplinary process may typically include the following:
- Investigate the misconduct and gather all relevant evidence.
- Notify the employee in writing of the disciplinary meeting, outlining the allegations, evidence, and their right to a support person or representative. Give them 24-48 hours’ notice and provide a time, date, and private location, such as an office.
- Hold the disciplinary meeting, allowing the employee to respond to the allegations and the relevant evidence you are relying on and any mitigating factors.
- Propose an outcome if the allegations are substantiated and give the employee an opportunity to comment on a proposed outcome (eg a written warning) before a final decision is made.
- Issue a written warning clearly outlining the misconduct, expected improvements, and consequences of further misconduct.
- Keep detailed records of the entire process.
The process must be fair, reasonable, proportionate, and consistent. If misconduct continues, further disciplinary action may be considered, but each step must be supported by a fair and lawful process.
The performance management process typically involves:
- Identifying the concerns and gathering relevant evidence.
- Notifying the employee of a performance concerns meeting, by providing them with 24-48 hours written notice of the meeting, the concerns to be discussed, any supporting documents, and inform them of their right to bring a support person
- Meeting with the employee to discuss the concerns, provide supporting information, and allow them to respond.
- Implementing a Performance Management Plan (PMP) with clear expectations, improvement goals, timeframes, and support measures.
- Monitoring progress through regular review meetings and feedback.
- If performance does not improve by the review period's end, invite the employee to a formal meeting, discuss the ongoing issues, propose a warning, and seek their feedback.
- Issueing a warning if required where performance does not improve, outlining the concerns, required improvements, and potential consequences.
A fair, reasonable, and consistent process is essential to ensure compliance and minimise legal risk.
How long is a written warning valid?
In New Zealand, a first written warning should specify how long it will remain in effect. Although legislation does not set an official expiry date, warnings typically remain valid for six to 12 months. Often these time periods are set out in the employee handbook. During this period, monitor the employee’s performance or behaviour for improvement.
Generally, if a written warning was issued more than 12 months ago it is usually considered invalid for any current disciplinary action.
